All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Evaluating Bacterial Viability in Faecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Comparative Analysis of In Vitro Cultivation and Membrane Integrity Methods

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064173%3A_____%2F24%3A43927610" target="_blank" >RIV/00064173:_____/24:43927610 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216208:11120/24:43927610 RIV/00023001:_____/24:00085166

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.25105" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.25105</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.25105" target="_blank" >10.1002/jcla.25105</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Evaluating Bacterial Viability in Faecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Comparative Analysis of In Vitro Cultivation and Membrane Integrity Methods

  • Original language description

    BACKGROUND: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a developing therapy for disorders related to gut dysbiosis. Despite its growing application, standardised protocols for FMT filtrate preparation and quality assessment remain undeveloped. The viability of bacteria in the filtrate is crucial for FMT&apos;s efficacy and for validating protocol execution. We compared two methods-in vitro cultivation and membrane integrity assessment-for their accuracy, reproducibility and clinical applicability in measuring bacterial viability in frozen FMT stool filtrate. METHODS: Bacterial viability in stool filtrate was evaluated using (i) membrane integrity through fluorescent DNA staining with SYTO9 and propidium iodide, followed by flow cytometry and (ii) culturable bacteria counts (colony-forming units, CFU) under aerobic or anaerobic conditions. RESULTS: Using different types of samples (pure bacterial culture, stool of germ-free and conventionally bred mice, native and heat-treated human stool), we refined the bacterial DNA staining protocol integrated with flow cytometry for assessment of bacterial viability in frozen human stool samples. Both the membrane integrity-based and cultivation-based methods exhibited significant variability in bacterial viability across different FMT filtrates, without correlation. The cultivation-based method showed a mean coefficient of variance of 30.3%, ranging from 7.4% to 60.1%. Conversely, the membrane integrity approach yielded more reproducible results, with a mean coefficient of variance for viable cells of 6.4% ranging from 0.2% to 18.2%. CONCLUSION: Bacterial viability assessment in stool filtrate using the membrane integrity method offers robust and precise data, making it a suitable option for faecal material evaluation in FMT. In contrast, the cultivation-dependent methods produce inconsistent outcomes.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30219 - Gastroenterology and hepatology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis

  • ISSN

    0887-8013

  • e-ISSN

    1098-2825

  • Volume of the periodical

    38

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    19-20

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    "e25105"

  • UT code for WoS article

    001324787400001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85205530518