To what extent can the chosen blood pressure measurement technique affect the outcomes of an observational survey?

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064190%3A_____%2F19%3AN0000042" target="_blank" >RIV/00064190:_____/19:N0000042 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11140/19:10397555 RIV/00669806:_____/19:10397555
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/cer-2018-0149" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/cer-2018-0149</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/cer-2018-0149" target="_blank" >10.2217/cer-2018-0149</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
To what extent can the chosen blood pressure measurement technique affect the outcomes of an observational survey?
Original language description
Aim: We analyzed to what extent measurement protocol influenced individual blood pressure (BP) and achievement of treatment target in patients with coronary heart disease. Methods: In a subsample of Czech EUROASPIRE III-V survey participants (n = 913), we compared the per-protocol BP measurement (by automated oscillometric device OMRON at the beginning of survey procedure) with control auscultatory measurement (by physician during interview). Results: Per-protocol approach produced significantly (p < 0.0001) higher BP values (by 9/6 mmHg in median) than auscultatory measurements and led to markedly higher proportion of patients over target BP (less than 140/ 90 mmHg; 59.3 vs 34.9% [p < 0.0001], per-protocol vs auscultatory technique, respectively). Conclusion: Per-protocol oscillometric technique was not equivalent to conventional auscultatory measurement and seriously over-rated the real nonachievement of BP target in observational surveys.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Project
<a href="/en/project/NV17-29520A" target="_blank" >NV17-29520A: Long term trends of CHD secondary prevention and risk prediction in selected sample of Czech population – Czech part of the EUROASPIRE V Study</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)