Flecainide versus digoxin for fetal supraventricular tachycardia: Comparison of two drug treatment protocols
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F16%3A10327960" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/16:10327960 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11130/16:10327960
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.023" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.023</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.023" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.023</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Flecainide versus digoxin for fetal supraventricular tachycardia: Comparison of two drug treatment protocols
Original language description
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for fetal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with 1:1 atrioventricular relationship is unclear. OBJECTIVE We compared the effectiveness of transplacental treatment protocols used in 2 centers. METHODS Pharmacologic treatment was used in 84 fetuses. Maternal oral flecainide was the primary therapy in center 1 (n = 34) and intravenous maternal digoxin in center 2 (n = 50). SVT mechanism was classified by mechanical ventriculoatrial (VA) time intervals as short VA or long VA. Treatment success was defined as conversion to sinus rhythm (SR), or rate control, defined as >15% rate reduction. RESULTS Short VA interval occurred in 67 fetuses (80%) and long VA in 17 (20%). Hydrops was present 28 of 84 (33%). For short VA SVT, conversion to SR was 29 of 42 (69%) for digoxin and 24 of 25 (96%) for flecainide (P=.01). For long VA SVT, conversion to SR and rate control was 4 of 8 (50%) and 0 of 8, respectively, for digoxin, and 6 of 9 (67%) and 2 of 9 (cumulative 89%) for flecainide (P=.13). In nonhydropic fetuses, digoxin was successful in 23 of 29 (79%) and flecainide in 26 of 27 (96%) (P=.10). In hydrops, digoxin was successful in 8 of 21 (38%), flecainide alone in 6 of 7 (86%, P=.07 vs digoxin), and flecainide amiodarone in 7 of 7 (100%) (P=.01). Intrauterine or neonatal death occurred in 9 of 21 hydropic fetuses treated with digoxin (43%), compared to 0 of 7 (P=.06) treated with flecainide. CONCLUSIONS Flecainide was more effective than digoxin, especially when hydrops was present. No adverse fetal outcomes were attributed to flecainide.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FA - Cardiovascular diseases including cardio-surgery
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Heart Rhythm
ISSN
1547-5271
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
13
Issue of the periodical within the volume
9
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
7
Pages from-to
1913-1919
UT code for WoS article
000382307400028
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—