All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of semi-quantitative and visual assessment of early MRI signal evolution in acute ischaemic stroke

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00098892%3A_____%2F23%3A10157932" target="_blank" >RIV/00098892:_____/23:10157932 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/61989592:15110/23:73623262

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235204772300014X?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235204772300014X?via%3Dihub</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100488" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100488</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of semi-quantitative and visual assessment of early MRI signal evolution in acute ischaemic stroke

  • Original language description

    Background: The evaluation of DWI/FLAIR mismatch in ischaemic stroke patients with unknown, time from onset can determine the treatment strategy. This approach is based on, visual assessment and may be subject to insufficient inter-rater agreement. Objective: To compare the inter-rater agreement of visual evaluation of FLAIR MRI and proposed region of interest (ROI) semiquantitative method in large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes. Methods: Five readers have analysed MRIs of 104 patients obtained within six hours of the onset of stroke symptoms resulting from LVO visually and semi-quantitatively. For the semiquantitative analysis, a ROI method was used to obtain relative signal intensity compared to the unaffected side. Cut-off values of 1.15 and 1.10 were tested. The analysis yielded FLAIR-positive (abnormal) and negative (normal) findings. Percentage agreement and Fleiss kappa coefficients were calculated. Results: The visual agreement of 5/5 readers and ≥ 4/5 readers occurred in 31% and 59% of cases respectively. Semi-quantitative evaluation using a cut-off value of 1.15 increased the agreements to 67% and 88% respectively. The agreement of visual evaluation was fair. The semi-quantitative method utilising the cut-off of 1.15 had moderate agreement although it increased the number of FLAIR-negative results compared to the visual evaluation. A low cut-off value of 1.10 didn&apos;t improve the agreement significantly. Conclusion: The inter-rater agreement of visual evaluation of FLAIR in patients with short-duration large vessel occlusion stroke was fair. The high cut-off value of semiquantitative evaluation increased the agreement although it changed the proportion of FLAIR positive and negative results.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30224 - Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    European Journal of Radiology Open

  • ISSN

    2352-0477

  • e-ISSN

    2352-0477

  • Volume of the periodical

    10

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    April

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    7

  • Pages from-to

    100488

  • UT code for WoS article

    001008929200001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85153172918