Methods of Candida dubliniensis identification and its occurrence in human clinical material
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00159816%3A_____%2F17%3A00067313" target="_blank" >RIV/00159816:_____/17:00067313 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216224:14110/17:00095672
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12223-017-0510-2" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12223-017-0510-2</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12223-017-0510-2" target="_blank" >10.1007/s12223-017-0510-2</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Methods of Candida dubliniensis identification and its occurrence in human clinical material
Original language description
Candida dubliniensis was reported as a new species in 1995. This species is often misidentified as Candida albicans. The aims of this work were to determine the occurrence of C. dubliniensis in various clinical materials, to evaluate several ways to identify it and to examine the genetic variability of isolates. Among 7706 isolates originally identified as C. albicans, 237 were identified as C. dubliniensis (3.1%). Most of the C. dubliniensis isolates were obtained from the upper and lower respiratory tract (61.4 and 22.9%). Five phenotypic methods including latex agglutination were used (cultivation on CHROMagar Candida, on Staib agar, at 42 A degrees C and in medium with 6.5% NaCl), but only cultivation on the medium with an increased concentration of NaCl and latex agglutination gave reliable results. Species-specific polymerase chain reaction was used as the confirmation method. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry provided less reliable results. In fact, 78.9% of C. dubliniensis isolates had scores above 1.7. However, the rest of them (21.1%) were also identified as C. dubliniensis even when the scores were lower than 1.7. Divergences among C. dubliniensis strains were evaluated by means of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Eighty-six selected C. dubliniensis isolates showed a 69.6% level of similarity. The results of this study expand the knowledge of the incidence, means of identification and genotypic divergence of C. dubliniensis isolates.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10606 - Microbiology
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Folia Microbiologica (Praha)
ISSN
0015-5632
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
62
Issue of the periodical within the volume
5
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
401-408
UT code for WoS article
000409167900005
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—