All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Clinical outcomes and survival comparison between NexGen all-poly and its metal-backed equivalent in total knee arthroplasty

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00159816%3A_____%2F23%3A00078678" target="_blank" >RIV/00159816:_____/23:00078678 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216224:14110/23:00131204

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00264-023-05772-3" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00264-023-05772-3</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05772-3" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00264-023-05772-3</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Clinical outcomes and survival comparison between NexGen all-poly and its metal-backed equivalent in total knee arthroplasty

  • Original language description

    PurposeThis study aims to compare total knee replacement (TKA) with NexGen All-Poly (APT) and NexGen Metal-Backed (MBT) in terms of implant survivorship, reasons leading to implant failure and functional results of defined age categories.MethodsA single-centre, retrospective evaluation of 812 patients who underwent knee replacement with NexGen CR between 2005 and 2021, comparing a modern congruent APT component to a modular MBT equivalent component using a similar surgical technique at a notable mean follow-up duration. Implant survival, functional outcomes using the Knee Society Score and range of motion were evaluated and compared in different age categories.ResultsOf the 812 NexGen CR TKAs performed at our institution, 410 (50.4%) used APT components and 402 (49.6%) MBT components. The survival rate of NexGen APT was 97.1% and that of NexGen MBT was 93.2% (p = 0.36). Removal of the implant occurred overall in 15 cases, for MBT in ten cases, and for APT in four cases. The FS was proved to be significantly higher when APT components were implanted in younger patients than for MBT (p = 0.005). A similar range of motion between the components was recorded (p = 0.1926).ConclusionUnder defined conditions, we measured the clinical results of implants from a single manufacturer implanted in a single department using a similar surgical technique. Considering the limitations, we suggest that all-polyethylene tibial components are equal or even superior to metal-backed ones across the examined age categories.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30211 - Orthopaedics

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS

  • ISSN

    0341-2695

  • e-ISSN

    1432-5195

  • Volume of the periodical

    47

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    9

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    7

  • Pages from-to

    2207-2213

  • UT code for WoS article

    000970731400001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85153065381