Comparison of contraction-type and noncontraction-type lymphatic vessels in lymphaticovenous anastomosis for cancer-related unilateral lower limb lymphedema: a retrospective cohort propensity-score-matched outcome analysis
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00159816%3A_____%2F24%3A00081076" target="_blank" >RIV/00159816:_____/24:00081076 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216224:14110/24:00136875
Result on the web
<a href="https://journals.lww.com/international-journal-of-surgery/fulltext/2024/04000/comparison_of_contraction_type_and.5.aspx" target="_blank" >https://journals.lww.com/international-journal-of-surgery/fulltext/2024/04000/comparison_of_contraction_type_and.5.aspx</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001106" target="_blank" >10.1097/JS9.0000000000001106</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Comparison of contraction-type and noncontraction-type lymphatic vessels in lymphaticovenous anastomosis for cancer-related unilateral lower limb lymphedema: a retrospective cohort propensity-score-matched outcome analysis
Original language description
Background:Contraction-type lymphatic vessels (LV) are considered suboptimal for lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA). However, despite these pathological changes, their functionality and link to outcomes have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to determine the impact on outcomes when contraction-type LVs were used for LVA compared to the noncontraction-type (normal + ectatic) counterpart for treating lower limb lymphedema. Study design:Eighty-three patients with gynecologic cancer-related unilateral lower-limb lymphedema who underwent LVA as their primary treatment were enrolled in this study. The study group included 20 patients who used only contraction-type LVs. An additional 63 patients (control group) received noncontraction-type LVs only. Patients with a history of LVA, liposuction, or excisional therapy were excluded. Patient characteristics, intraoperative findings, functional parameters, and pre-LVA and post-LVA volume changes were recorded and matched using propensity scores. The primary endpoint was the volume change at 6/12 months after LVA. Results:After matching, 20 patients were included in each group. All parameters were matched, except that the study group still had a significantly inferior indocyanine green (ICG)-positive ratio, lymph flow-positive ratio, and washout-positive ratios (P<0.001, P=0.003, and P<0.001, respectively) when compared to the control group after matching. However, at 1-year follow-up, the postoperative percentage volume reduction was comparable between the groups (P=0.619). Conclusion:The use of contraction-type LVs for LVA is encouraged when no other LVs are available.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30212 - Surgery
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
International Journal of Surgery
ISSN
1743-9191
e-ISSN
1743-9159
Volume of the periodical
110
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
6
Pages from-to
1913-1918
UT code for WoS article
001203304700013
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—