All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Using noise to distinguish between system and observer effects in multimodal neuroimaging

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00159816%3A_____%2F25%3A00082238" target="_blank" >RIV/00159816:_____/25:00082238 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/computational-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fncom.2025.1693279/full" target="_blank" >https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/computational-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fncom.2025.1693279/full</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2025.1693279" target="_blank" >10.3389/fncom.2025.1693279</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Using noise to distinguish between system and observer effects in multimodal neuroimaging

  • Original language description

    Introduction It has become increasingly common to record brain activity simultaneously at more than one spatiotemporal scale. Here, we address a central question raised by such cross-scale datasets: do they reflect the same underlying dynamics observed in different ways, or different dynamics observed in the same way? In other words, to what extent can variation between modalities be attributed to system-level versus observer-level effects? System-level effects reflect genuine differences in neural dynamics at the resolution sampled by each device. Observer-level effects, by contrast, reflect artefactual differences introduced by the nonlinear transformations each device imposes on the signal. We demonstrate that noise, when incorporated into generative models, can help disentangle these two sources of variation.Methods We apply this noise-based approach to simultaneously recorded high-frequency broadband signals from macroelectrodes and microwires in the human hippocampus.Results Most subjects show a complex mixture of system- and observer-level contributions to their time series. However, in one subject, the cross-scale difference is statistically attributable to an observer-level effect-i.e., consistent with the same dynamics at both microwire and macroelectrode scales.Discussion This study shows that noise can be used in empirical datasets to determine whether cross-scale variation arises from differences in neural dynamics or differences in observer functions.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/NW25-04-00226" target="_blank" >NW25-04-00226: Enhancing epilepsy treatment with temporal interference of electric fields and advanced computational strategies</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

    1662-5188

  • Volume of the periodical

    19

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    neuvedeno

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    9

  • Pages from-to

    nestránkováno

  • UT code for WoS article

    001605117300001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database