Using noise to distinguish between system and observer effects in multimodal neuroimaging
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00159816%3A_____%2F25%3A00082238" target="_blank" >RIV/00159816:_____/25:00082238 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/computational-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fncom.2025.1693279/full" target="_blank" >https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/computational-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fncom.2025.1693279/full</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2025.1693279" target="_blank" >10.3389/fncom.2025.1693279</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Using noise to distinguish between system and observer effects in multimodal neuroimaging
Original language description
Introduction It has become increasingly common to record brain activity simultaneously at more than one spatiotemporal scale. Here, we address a central question raised by such cross-scale datasets: do they reflect the same underlying dynamics observed in different ways, or different dynamics observed in the same way? In other words, to what extent can variation between modalities be attributed to system-level versus observer-level effects? System-level effects reflect genuine differences in neural dynamics at the resolution sampled by each device. Observer-level effects, by contrast, reflect artefactual differences introduced by the nonlinear transformations each device imposes on the signal. We demonstrate that noise, when incorporated into generative models, can help disentangle these two sources of variation.Methods We apply this noise-based approach to simultaneously recorded high-frequency broadband signals from macroelectrodes and microwires in the human hippocampus.Results Most subjects show a complex mixture of system- and observer-level contributions to their time series. However, in one subject, the cross-scale difference is statistically attributable to an observer-level effect-i.e., consistent with the same dynamics at both microwire and macroelectrode scales.Discussion This study shows that noise can be used in empirical datasets to determine whether cross-scale variation arises from differences in neural dynamics or differences in observer functions.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/NW25-04-00226" target="_blank" >NW25-04-00226: Enhancing epilepsy treatment with temporal interference of electric fields and advanced computational strategies</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
1662-5188
Volume of the periodical
19
Issue of the periodical within the volume
neuvedeno
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
nestránkováno
UT code for WoS article
001605117300001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—