Centrifugation versus PureGraft for fatgrafting to the breast after breast-conserving therapy
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F14%3A10282304" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/14:10282304 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00064211:_____/14:#0000415 RIV/00216208:11120/14:43908534 RIV/00064173:_____/14:#0000468
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-178" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-178</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-178" target="_blank" >10.1186/1477-7819-12-178</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Centrifugation versus PureGraft for fatgrafting to the breast after breast-conserving therapy
Original language description
Background: Breast-conserving treatment (BCT) leads to a progressive and deteriorating breast deformity. Fatgrafting is ideal for breast reconstruction after BCT. The most frequently utilized technique for fat processing is centrifugation. The PureGraftdevice (Cytori Therapeutics, San Diego, CA, USA) is a new method that involves washing and filtering the fat to prepare the graft. We compared the subjective and objective outcomes of two fat-processing methods, centrifugation and PureGraft filtration. Methods: Thirty patients underwent breast reconstruction performed by a single surgeon (OM) after BCT in our department between April 2011 and September 2012. The patients were preoperatively divided into two groups randomly: 15 received fatgrafts processed by centrifugation, and 15 received fatgrafts processed by washing in PureGraft bags. The patients were followed up for 12 to 30 months. To measure the subjective outcome, we distributed the BREAST-Q questionnaire to all the patients bo
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FJ - Surgery including transplantology
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/NT11382" target="_blank" >NT11382: Verification of the possibility of using hydrogels as selected osmotic tissue expanders and tissue fillers in reconstructive surgery</a><br>
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2014
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
ISSN
1477-7819
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
12
Issue of the periodical within the volume
Jun
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
—
UT code for WoS article
000338246600001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—