A survey of the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy members' research involvement, and associated enablers and barriers
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F20%3A10415175" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/20:10415175 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11160/20:10415175
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=9q.8CQd.p9" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=9q.8CQd.p9</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-01054-9" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11096-020-01054-9</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
A survey of the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy members' research involvement, and associated enablers and barriers
Original language description
Background: Building research capacity of European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP) members aligns to the organisation's aim of advancing research. Objective: To determine members' aspirations and needs in research training and practice, and to explore ways in which ESCP could provide support. Setting: ESCP's international membership. Method: Cross-sectional survey of members in 2018, followed by focus groups with samples of respondents attending an ESCP symposium. Survey items were: research activities; interests, experience and confidence; and Likert statements on research conduct. Principal component analysis (PCA) clustering of Likert statements from a previous study was used, with scores for each component calculated. Focus groups discussed barriers to research and how ESCP could provide support. Data analysis involved collating and comparing all themes. Main outcome measures: Research interest, experience and confidence; attitudinal items; barriers to research; ESCP support. Results: The response rate was 16.7% (83/499), with 89.2% (n = 74) involved in research and 79.5% (n = 66) publishing research in the preceding 2 years. While overwhelmingly positive, responses were more positive for research interest than experience or confidence. PCA component scores (support/opportunities, motivation/outcomes, and roles/characteristics) were positive. Thirteen members participated in focus groups, identifying barriers of: insufficient collaboration; lack of knowledge, skills, training; unsupportive environment; insufficient time; and limited resources. ESCP could support through mentorship, collaboration, education and funding. Conclusion: Study participants were highly active, interested, experienced, confident and positive regarding research. There is an opportunity for ESCP to harness these activities and provide support in the form of mentoring, education and training, and facilitating collaboration.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30104 - Pharmacology and pharmacy
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
ISSN
2210-7703
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
42
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS
Number of pages
15
Pages from-to
1073-1087
UT code for WoS article
000534215300003
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85085322357