Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes in Unilateral Versus Bilateral DIEP Flap Reconstructions: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F25%3A10497357" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/25:10497357 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=KUn-teKc0V" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=KUn-teKc0V</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041056" target="_blank" >10.3390/jcm14041056</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes in Unilateral Versus Bilateral DIEP Flap Reconstructions: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
Original language description
Background/Objectives: The DIEP flap is among the preferred techniques in autologous breast reconstruction due to better long-term outcomes, including higher satisfaction and more natural breast shape compared to implant-based breast reconstruction. With the rise in genetic testing, bilateral DIEP reconstructions are becoming more common, though they carry a higher risk of complications. This study aims to compare the risks between unilateral and bilateral procedures to improve surgical decision-making. Methods: A retrospective, single-center review was conducted on female patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction between January 2018 and May 2024. The study included patients with complete medical records and follow-up data, excluding those with incomplete records. Patient characteristics, operative details, and complications were thoroughly analyzed, with donor site complications assessed per patient and recipient site complications per breast. Results: During the study, 141 DIEP flaps were performed on 114 women, with 87 unilateral and 27 bilateral reconstructions. Age and BMI were similar between groups. However, chemotherapy was more common in the bilateral group (85% vs. 47%, p = 0.0011). Operative time was significantly longer in bilateral procedures (650 vs. 460 min, p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in recipient and donor site complications across groups. The hospital stay was significantly longer in the bilateral group (11 vs. 8.8 days, p = 0.024). Conclusions: Bilateral and unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions have similar complication and early take-back rates.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30212 - Surgery
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Clinical Medicine
ISSN
2077-0383
e-ISSN
2077-0383
Volume of the periodical
14
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
1056
UT code for WoS article
001430547500001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85219174853