Evolution and Adaptations of Robotic DIEP Flap Surgery: A Systematic Review
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F25%3A00140562" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/25:00140562 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/abstract/2025/01000/evolution_and_adaptations_of_robotic_diep_flap.87.aspx" target="_blank" >https://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/abstract/2025/01000/evolution_and_adaptations_of_robotic_diep_flap.87.aspx</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010790" target="_blank" >10.1097/SCS.0000000000010790</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Evolution and Adaptations of Robotic DIEP Flap Surgery: A Systematic Review
Original language description
Background:The integration of robotic technology into surgical procedures has gained considerable attention for its promise to enhance a variety of clinical outcomes. Robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest has emerged as a novel approach for autologous breast reconstruction. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current techniques, outcomes, and complications of robotic DIEP flap surgery.Methods:A systematic literature search was conducted after PRISMA 2020 guidelines across databases including PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science from 2000 to 2023. Articles exploring robotic DIEP flap harvest for breast reconstruction were assessed to compare operative techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications. The risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.Results:Fourteen studies involving 108 patients were included. Three studies used a totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique, whereas 11 studies used a transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach. Preoperative planning utilized computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography imaging. The mean robotic operative time was 64 minutes, with total operative times averaging 574 minutes for TAPP and 497 minutes for TEP. The mean length of stay was 5 days, and the mean fascial incision length was 3 cm. Overall complication rate was 14.9%, with no significant difference compared with conventional DIEP flap procedures.Conclusion:Robotic DIEP flap harvest is a promising technique that may reduce postoperative pain and limiting abdominal donor site morbidity. Potential limitations include longer operative times, variable hospital stays, and increased costs.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30212 - Surgery
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
ISSN
1049-2275
e-ISSN
1536-3732
Volume of the periodical
36
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
6
Pages from-to
362-367
UT code for WoS article
001386097900008
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85208663445