Determination of dialysis dose: a clinical comparison of methods

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F11%3A00002963" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/11:00002963 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000330340" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000330340</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000330340" target="_blank" >10.1159/000330340</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Determination of dialysis dose: a clinical comparison of methods
Original language description
Guidelines recommend regular measurements of the delivered hemodialysis dose Kt/V. Nowadays, automatic non-invasive online measurements are available as alternatives to the conventional method with blood sampling, laboratory analysis, and calculation. Ina prospective clinical trial, three different methods determining dialysis dose were simultaneously applied: Kt/V(Dau) (conventional method with Daugirdas' formula), Kt/V(OCM) [online clearance measurement (OCM) with urea distribution volume V based onanthropometric estimate], and Kt/V(BCM) [OCM measurement with V measured by bioimpedance analysis (Body Composition Monitor)]. Conclusions: The automated OCM Kt/V(OCM) with anthropometric estimation of urea distribution volume was the easiest method to use, but Kt/V(BCM) with measured urea distribution volume was closer to the conventional method
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FD - Oncology and haematology
OECD FORD branch
—

Publication year
2011
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)