All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The Slavcleft: A three-center study of the outcome of treatment of cleft lip and palate. Nasolabial appearance

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F21%3A43921204" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/21:43921204 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00064173:_____/21:N0000263 RIV/61989592:15110/21:73611404

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10631" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10631</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10631" target="_blank" >10.7717/peerj.10631</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The Slavcleft: A three-center study of the outcome of treatment of cleft lip and palate. Nasolabial appearance

  • Original language description

    Background: There is a multitude of protocols of treatment of cleft lip and palate (CLP) worldwide differing in number of operations, surgical techniques, and timings of surgeries. Despite, facial appearance in subjects with CLP is rarely ideal and residual stigmata are easy to notice in many patients irrespective of the protocol. The prospective controlled investigations are optimal for comparing effectiveness of treatment protocols. Because prospective studies are very challenging to perform in CLP field, it is reasonable to retrospectively assess different surgical protocols to identify the promising ones and then to test them in a prospective way. Methods: Our objective was to assess the nasolabial appearance in a preadolescent Slavic population with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) by using the 0 200 numeric scale with reference photographs. Patients treated in Warsaw, Poland (n = 32), Prague, Czech Republic (n = 26) and Bratislava, Slovakia (n = 17) were included in this retrospective study. Each cleft center used a unique surgical protocol. Two panels of professional raters (n = 7) and laypeople (n = 10) scored blindly the nasolabial esthetics on cropped frontal and profile images with cropped reference photograph present on the same slide. Intra-and inter-rater agreement was assessed with Cronbach s alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients, t-Tests, and Bland Altman plots. Inter-group differences were evaluated with one-way ANOVA and regression analysis. Results: The agreement within and between raters was acceptable. We found that patients treated in Warsaw, Prague, and Bratislava showed comparable nasolabial appearance on frontal and profile photographs when judged by both professional raters (p 0.05) and laypeople (p 0.05). Regression analysis did not identify influence of gender, group (i.e., Warsaw, Prague, and Bratislava), age at lip repair, surgeon, and age at photographic assessment on esthetic outcome (p 0.05). Conclusion: This study showed that none of the surgical protocols showed superiority to produce good nasolabial appearance.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30208 - Dentistry, oral surgery and medicine

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    PeerJ

  • ISSN

    2167-8359

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    9

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    February

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    "e10631"

  • UT code for WoS article

    000616406800006

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85101022405