Judgment of Nasolabial Esthetics in Cleft Lip and Palate Is Not Influenced by Overall Facial Attractiveness.
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F16%3A33162152" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15110/16:33162152 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/14-019" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/14-019</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/14-019" target="_blank" >10.1597/14-019</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Judgment of Nasolabial Esthetics in Cleft Lip and Palate Is Not Influenced by Overall Facial Attractiveness.
Original language description
Objective: To determine whether judgment of nasolabial esthetics in cleft lip and palate (CLP) is influenced by overall facial attractiveness. Design: Experimental study. Setting: University of Bern, Switzerland. Subjects and Methods: Seventy-two fused images (36 of boys, 36 of girls) were constructed. Each image comprised (1) the nasolabial region of a treated child with complete unilateral CLP (UCLP) and (2) the external facial features, i.e., the face with masked nasolabial region, of a noncleft child. Photographs of the nasolabial region of six boys and six girls with UCLP representing a wide range of esthetic outcomes, i.e., from very good to very poor appearance, were randomly chosen from a sample of 60 consecutively treated patients in whom nasolabial esthetics had been rated in a previous study. Photographs of external facial features of six boys and six girls without UCLP with various esthetics were randomly selected from patients' files. Eight lay raters evaluated the fused images using a 100-mm visual analogue scale. Method reliability was assessed by reevaluation of fused images after >1 month. A regression model was used to analyze which elements of facial esthetics influenced the perception of nasolabial appearance. Results: Method reliability was good. A regression analysis demonstrated that only the appearance of the nasolabial area affected the esthetic scores of fused images (coefficient = MINUS SIGN 11.44; P < .001; R2 = 0.464). The appearance of the external facial features did not influence perceptions of fused images. Conclusion: Cropping facial images for assessment of nasolabial appearance in CLP seems unnecessary. Instead, esthetic evaluation can be performed on images of full faces.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FF - ENT (ie. ear, nose, throat), ophthalmology, dentistry
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
ISSN
1055-6656
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
53
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
"e-45"-"e-52"
UT code for WoS article
000380854800001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—