Evaluation of a Clinical Index as a Predictive Tool for Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11130%2F21%3A10428938" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11130/21:10428938 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00064203:_____/21:10428938
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=VYnRymk3iY" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=VYnRymk3iY</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11061088" target="_blank" >10.3390/diagnostics11061088</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Evaluation of a Clinical Index as a Predictive Tool for Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia
Original language description
BACKGROUND: In primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) there is no single diagnostic test. Different predictive tools have been proposed to guide referral of high-risk patients for further diagnostic workup. We aimed to test clinical index (CI) on a large unselected cohort and compare its characteristics with other widely used tools-PICADAR and NA-CDCF. METHODS: CI, PICADAR, and NA-CDCF scores were calculated in 1401 patients with suspected PCD referred to our center. Their predictive characteristics were analyzed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and compared to each other. Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) was measured in 569 patients older than 3 years. RESULTS: PCD was diagnosed in 67 (4.8%) patients. CI, PICADAR, and NA-CDCF scores were higher in PCD than in nonPCD group (all p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for CI was larger than for NA-CDCF (p = 0.005); AUC(PICADAR) and AUC(NA-CDCF) did not differ (p = 0.093). An overlap in signs and symptoms among tools was identified. PICADAR could not be assessed in 86 (6.1%) patients without chronic wet cough. For CI laterality or congenital heart defects assessment was not necessary. nNO further improved predictive power of all three tools. CONCLUSION: CI is a feasible predictive tool for PCD that may outperform PICADAR and NA-CFCD.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30209 - Paediatrics
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/NV19-07-00210" target="_blank" >NV19-07-00210: Primary ciliary dyskinesia: Genetic, structural and functional determinants of the disease course and prognosis.</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Diagnostics [online]
ISSN
2075-4418
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
11
Issue of the periodical within the volume
6
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
—
UT code for WoS article
000666983200001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85110213666