Timing of episiotomy and outcome of a non-instrumental vaginal delivery
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11140%2F16%3A10318443" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11140/16:10318443 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12814" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12814</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12814" target="_blank" >10.1111/aogs.12814</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Timing of episiotomy and outcome of a non-instrumental vaginal delivery
Original language description
The aim of this study was to compare to compare immediate delivery outcome as well as healing, pain, anal incontinence and sexuality in a short-term and a long-term follow up after episiotomy performed before or at crowning in nulliparous women. This cohort study is a comparison of prospectively collected data evaluating the importance of the timing of episiotomy. Patients with episiotomy performed before crowning (n = 86) and at crowning (n = 404) were compared. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries rate, additional perineal or vaginal trauma, neonatal outcome, episiotomy length, 2nd stage of labor duration, blood loss, infection, hematoma, dehiscence, need for resuturing, pain, painful defecation, resumption of sexual intercourse, dyspareunia, anal incontinence and constipation were assessed immediately after delivery or from responses to questionnaires 24 and 72 h, 10 days, 3 and 6 months postpartum. The groups did not differ in age, body mass index, birthweight, occipito-posterior presentation, shoulder dystocia, or episiotomy type. Significant differences between before crowning and at crowning groups were observed in additional vaginal trauma [26 (30.2%) vs. 66 (16.3%), respectively, p < 0.001], mean episiotomy length (42 mm vs. 36 mm, p < 0.001), and mean estimated blood loss (367 mL vs. 344 mL, p < 0.001). Difference in obstetric anal sphincter injuries rate did not reach statistical significance [0 (0.0%) vs. 7 (1.7%), p = 0.61]. The groups did not differ in additional perineal trauma, pain (Visual Analogue Scale, Verbal Rating Scale and Activities of Daily Living scales), healing complications, sexual functions or anal incontinence in short-term or long-term follow up. Our results suggest that episiotomy performed at crowning is not associated with worse anatomical or functional delivery outcome, and support a restrictive approach to episiotomy. The effect of episiotomy timing on pelvic organ prolapse development remains to be determined.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FK - Gynaecology and obstetrics
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
ISSN
0001-6349
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
95
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
DK - DENMARK
Number of pages
7
Pages from-to
190-196
UT code for WoS article
000368004300008
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-84954173753