Automated compared to manual office blood pressure and to home blood pressure in hypertensive patients
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11140%2F16%3A10329462" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11140/16:10329462 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2015.1134086" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2015.1134086</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2015.1134086" target="_blank" >10.3109/08037051.2015.1134086</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Automated compared to manual office blood pressure and to home blood pressure in hypertensive patients
Original language description
We studied the relationships of automated blood pressure (BP), measured in the healthcare centre, with manual office BP and home BP. Stable outpatients treated for hypertension were measured automatically, seated alone in a quiet room, six times after a 5 min rest with the BpTRU device, and immediately afterwards using the auscultatory method. Home BP was measured in a subgroup during 7 days preceding the visit. The automated, office and home BP values were 131.2 +/- 21.8/77.8 +/- 12.1mmHg, 146.9 +/- 20.8/85.8 +/- 12.4mmHg and 137.7 +/- 17.7/79.4 +/- 8.2mmHg, respectively. Limits of agreement between office and automated BP (2 SDs in Bland-Altman plots) were+42.6 to -12.6/+22.6 to -6.6mmHg for systolic/diastolic BP; for home and automated BP they were+45.8 to -25.8/+20.8 to -12.6mmHg. For patients with two visits, intraclass correlation coefficients of BP values measured during the first and second visits were 0.66/0.72 for systolic/diastolic automated BP and 0.68/0.74 for systolic/diastolic office BP. Automated BP was lower than home BP and no more closely related to home BP than to office BP. It did not show better repeatability than office BP. Whether automated BP and the white-coat effect, calculated cas the office BP-automated BP difference, have clinical and prognostic importance deserves further studies.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FA - Cardiovascular diseases including cardio-surgery
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Blood Pressure
ISSN
0803-7051
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
25
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
7
Pages from-to
228-234
UT code for WoS article
000380053800005
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-84958037665