In the aftermath of SPRINT: further comparison of unattended automated office blood pressure measurement and 24-hour blood pressure monitoring

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11140%2F18%3A10380828" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11140/18:10380828 - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/00179906:_____/18:10380828 RIV/00669806:_____/18:10380828

Result on the web

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2018.1454258" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2018.1454258</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2018.1454258" target="_blank" >10.1080/08037051.2018.1454258</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

In the aftermath of SPRINT: further comparison of unattended automated office blood pressure measurement and 24-hour blood pressure monitoring

Original language description

Aims: Several papers reported that unattended automated office blood pressure (uAutoOBP) is closely related to daytime ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). In the present study, we aim to study uAutoOBP and its relation to 24-hour ABPM and ABPM variability.Material and methods: Stable treated hypertensive subjects were examined in two Czech academic hypertension centres. uAutoOBP was measured with the BP Tru device; attended BP three times with auscultatory method (AuscOBP) by the physician. ABPM was performed within one week from the clinical visit.Results: Data on 98 subjects aged 67.79.3 years with 24-hour ABPM 120.3 +/- 10.6/72.7 +/- 7.9mm Hg are reported. uAutoOBP was lower than 24-hour (by -5.2 +/- 11.3/-0.5 +/- 6.9mm Hg) and daytime (by -6.7 +/- 12.82.4 +/- 8.0mm Hg) ABPM and the individual variability of the difference was very large (up to 30mm Hg). The correlation coefficients between ABPM and uAutoOBP were similar compared to AuscOBP (p.17). Variability of uAutoOBP, but not AuscOBP, readings during one clinical visit was related to short-term blood pressure variability of ABPM. The difference between AuscOBP and uAutoOBP was larger in patients with white-coat effect compared to other blood pressure control groups (25.1 +/- 7.0 vs. 2.2 +/- 10.3mm Hg; p=.0036).Conclusions: Our study shows that uAutoOBP is not good predictor of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, not even of the daytime values. It might, however, indicate short-term blood pressure variability and, when compared with AuscOBP, also detect patients with white-coat effect.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Project

—

Continuities

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2018

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Blood Pressure

ISSN

0803-7051

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

27

Issue of the periodical within the volume

5

Country of publishing house

GB - UNITED KINGDOM

Number of pages

6

Pages from-to

256-261

UT code for WoS article

000443844900003

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85044394513