Verbal Aspect in the Czech and Russian Imperative
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F18%3A10426284" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/18:10426284 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/heiup/catalog/book/361" target="_blank" >https://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/heiup/catalog/book/361</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Verbal Aspect in the Czech and Russian Imperative
Original language description
The opposing perfective (PV) and imperfective (IPV) aspects are not used uniformly across Slavic languages. One of the areas of variation is the imperative, where especially Russian is known to express special pragmatic meanings (politeness and rudeness) through the IPV (Padučeva 22010, Benac-chio 2010), a possibility which other languages like Czech possibly lack. Using corpus data, this paper attempts to check Benacchio's claims that Czech makes almost no use of the pragmatic IPV imperative. One study compares the relative frequencies of PV and IPV imperatives for a chosen number of aspect pairs in Czech, Polish and Russian using the Aranea webcorpora; the other study uses the parallel corpus InterCorp (v9) to compare the frequency of Czech IPV imper-atives corresponding to Russian PV and vice versa. Both studies show the IPV imperative to be more widespread in Russian than in Czech (and Polish), lending support to Benacchio's claims.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60203 - Linguistics
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
—
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů