All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Sellars on modality: possible worlds and rules of inference

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F24%3A10490308" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/24:10490308 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=mi8IuAiNc6" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=mi8IuAiNc6</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2023.2242895" target="_blank" >10.1080/09608788.2023.2242895</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Sellars on modality: possible worlds and rules of inference

  • Original language description

    This paper discusses the account of alethic modality as presented by Wilfrid Sellars in his earlier work from 1947 to 1958. Its aim is twofold. First, I discuss Sellars&apos; analysis by exploring its historical relationship to Carnap&apos;s account of modality. I argue that Carnap&apos;s early syntactic treatment of modality profoundly influenced Sellars&apos; own so-called &apos;regulist&apos; account of modality in terms of rules of inference. Furthermore, it is suggested that Sellars&apos; lesser-known possible worlds analysis was influenced by Carnap&apos;s later semantic account of modality. The second aim of the paper is a critical one. I raise a number of objections to Sellars&apos; account of modality and argue that his account confronts some serious limitations. I also argue that Sellars does not provide a satisfying explanation of the relationship between his regulist account and his possible worlds analysis. I offer such an explanation by arguing that his regulist account should be understood as a pragmatic account of what is conveyed by the use of modal sentences, whereas his possible worlds analysis is a semantic account of the asserted content of modal statements. That is, the regulist account and the possible worlds analysis have different explanatory targets.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    British Journal for the History of Philosophy

  • ISSN

    0960-8788

  • e-ISSN

    1469-3526

  • Volume of the periodical

    32

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    26

  • Pages from-to

    606-631

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85168873594