All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Sellars on the Intersubjectivity of “We-Intentions”

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23330%2F23%3A43966688" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23330/23:43966688 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003303619-3/sellars-intersubjectivity-intentions-stefanie-dach?context=ubx&refId=474623f1-844f-4310-9efa-7e5f0708be89" target="_blank" >https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003303619-3/sellars-intersubjectivity-intentions-stefanie-dach?context=ubx&refId=474623f1-844f-4310-9efa-7e5f0708be89</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003303619-3" target="_blank" >10.4324/9781003303619-3</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Sellars on the Intersubjectivity of “We-Intentions”

  • Original language description

    The notion of intersubjective “we-intentions” is central to Sellars&apos;s philosophical system, especially to his account of morality. However, what precisely makes these intentions intersubjective and why we need them often remains unclear in Sellars&apos;s texts. This chapter attempts to bring more clarity to these issues. I argue that we can characterize the moral domain from a Sellarsian perspective as a domain of consonant practical reasoning with intentions. I show that “I-intentions” cannot serve in such consonant practical reasoning because of two constraining features: their indexicality and their merely relative reasonableness. I then reconstruct how Sellars can address these two problems. I also suggest that there is a change in Sellars&apos;s ideas about the intersubjective aspects of we-intentions at the end of his career, where he seems to abandon his former “mode account.” Based on this reconstruction of Sellars&apos;s motivations for introducing intersubjective intentions, I argue that this change is a sensible one.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60302 - Ethics (except ethics related to specific subfields)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA20-04496S" target="_blank" >GA20-04496S: Constructing Pragmatism - Wilfrid Sellars and the Pragmatist Tradition</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Ethics, Practical Reasoning, Agency: Wilfrid Sellars’s Practical Philosophy

  • ISBN

    978-1-03-230143-3

  • Number of pages of the result

    21

  • Pages from-to

    15-35

  • Number of pages of the book

    262

  • Publisher name

    Routledge

  • Place of publication

    New York

  • UT code for WoS chapter