Judicial Appointments: The article 255 TFEU Advisory Panel and selection procedures in the Member States
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F14%3A10190569" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/14:10190569 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11230/14:10190569
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Judicial Appointments: The article 255 TFEU Advisory Panel and selection procedures in the Member States
Original language description
This article is the first attempt to assess in-depth recent reforms of the appointment procedure for members of the Court of Justice and the General Court of the European Union. The authors evaluate the effects of the establishment of the Article 255 TFEU Panel. Next to a discussion on the transparency of the Panel's opinions, the criteria set and the role it plays in reappointments, the authors present comprehensive case studies of the selection procedure in fourteen Member States chosen with due regard for balanced representation between new and old, and small and large EU countries, and major European legal cultures. The analysis shows that far from being a paper tiger, the Article 255 TFEU Panel has proven to have a significant impact. It has not only exercised a chilling effect on a number of national nominations but also indirectly influenced the selection processes in some of the Member States, thus limiting arbitrariness. Opening up judicial appointments to scrutiny at both the
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AG - Legal sciences
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA407%2F09%2F1747" target="_blank" >GA407/09/1747: Eastern Enlargement and Patterns of Decision-making in the European Union</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2014
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Common Market Law Review
ISSN
0165-0750
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
51
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS
Number of pages
28
Pages from-to
455-482
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—