All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Taking of Evidence in Construction Arbitration: Focus on the Czech Republic

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F19%3A10414977" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/19:10414977 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Taking of Evidence in Construction Arbitration: Focus on the Czech Republic

  • Original language description

    This chapter concerns the very broad and varied issues that may arise in evidence gathering and evidence assessment in construction arbitration. When parties work together for a long time, as the case usually is in the construction industry, their cooperation involves a complex set of facts and diverse legal questions. This is further amplified by the fact that construction arbitration often involves a number of parties with divergent interests. A multiparty construction dispute may involve a contractor and an employer as the contractual parties to the contract for work and also many subcontractors, project managers, architects, designers, consultants, engineers, suppliers and banks or insurance companies. Apart from the hurdle of consolidating all these parties into one arbitral proceeding while relying on their consent, such cooperation also generates accordingly voluminous documentation. These features of construction arbitration generally require arbitral tribunals to use their powers towards careful case management and efficient conduct of the proceedings from the very beginning. Importantly, the proactive role of the tribunal is essential with regard to taking of evidence. These issues and the role of the arbitral tribunal are summarized in the introduction of the chapter (§ 8.01) followed by a description of the process of evidence gathering (§ 8.02). The chapter further focuses on the forms the evidence is usually manifested in: documentary (§ 8.03), expert (§ 8.04) and factual evidence (§ 8.05). The findings are summarized in the conclusion (§ 8.06).

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Construction Arbitration in Central and Eastern Europe: Contemporary Issues

  • ISBN

    978-94-035-0331-8

  • Number of pages of the result

    20

  • Pages from-to

    141-160

  • Number of pages of the book

    312

  • Publisher name

    Kluwer Law International B.V.

  • Place of publication

    Neuveden.

  • UT code for WoS chapter