What is a decision? A post-structuralist exploration of the trinity of decidedness, undecidedness and undecidability

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F16%3A10328500" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/16:10328500 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="http://www.researchingcommunication.eu/SuSo15-book-final.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.researchingcommunication.eu/SuSo15-book-final.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

What is a decision? A post-structuralist exploration of the trinity of decidedness, undecidedness and undecidability

Original language description

Decidedness has been celebrated in many societal spheres as the unquestioned, fetishized and ultimate moment of the exercise of political agency, where political or business leaders wield their powers and authorities. Conversely, the failure to decide, undecidedness, is seen as the failure of political agency, of leadership, and of politics or business itself. This chapter offers a more nuanced perspective on decidedness and undecidedness, by exploring their interdependent relationship, grounded in a deconstructive strategy. The relationship between these binary opposites will be enriched and deepened by introducing a third notion, undecidability, which is a broader concept that describes the ontological impossibility of a discursive order to ultimately ixate reality. In the irst parts of the chapter, the usages of decision and indecision, decidedness and undecidedness, are discussed in combination with an explanation of the notion of undecidability as it has been developed in post-structuralist theory (in particular, in Laclau and Mouffe's discourse-theoretical framework). These relections provide support for the deinition of the decision as a temporary ixation, which does not escape from the context of undecidability. It is this context that produces undecidedness. Decidedness should not be discredited either, as -despite its limitations- it remains a requirement for the political to function and a signiicant driving force. The importance of decidedness, and the coping strategies developed to deal with its failures, is theorized in the last part of the chapter, by reverting to the psychoanalytical concept of the fantasy. The conclusion then invokes the idea that in order to understand the social and the political, we need the conceptual strength of the trinity of decidedness, undecidedness and undecidability.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

C - Chapter in a specialist book

CEP classification

AJ - Literature, mass media, audio-visual activities

OECD FORD branch

—

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2016

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Book/collection name

Politics, Civil Society and Participation : media and communications in a transforming environment

ISBN

978-3-943245-54-7

Number of pages of the result

17

Pages from-to

87-103

Number of pages of the book

411

Publisher name

edition lumière

Place of publication

Bremen

UT code for WoS chapter

—