All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

When evidence is not taken for granted: the use and perception of evidence in the Czech Republic ministries

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F18%3A10384518" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/18:10384518 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2018-0020" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2018-0020</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2018-0020" target="_blank" >10.2478/nispa-2018-0020</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    When evidence is not taken for granted: the use and perception of evidence in the Czech Republic ministries

  • Original language description

    Th e role of evidence in policy-making is one of the most researched topics in public policy and public administration. However, surprisingly little research has been done on how public offi cials actually use evidence in everyday life practice. Moreover, these studies have been limited to countries that have been influenced by the evidence-based policy movement (EBP). Little is known about how the evidence is conceptualized and utilized in other countries which have not been so strongly influenced by EBP movement. Th is paper addresses this gap. Using a large-N survey on the Czech ministerial offi cials and in-depth interviews with them, we explore what is understood under the term of &quot;evidence&quot;, what kind of evidence is used and preferred by public offi cials and why. In doing so, we use four theoretical perspectives on the use of evidence. We show that despite the long-established tradition of using research in policy-making the importance of research evidence in the Czech Republic is far from being taken for granted. On the contrary, the immediate and personal experience is oft en preferred over the research fi ndings. Th e exception to that are census-like statistical data and comparative data published by international organizations. We fi nd some support for the two-communities metaphor, though these communities are not defi ned by their socio-demographic characteristics, but rather by their internal discourse and understanding of evidence. (C) 2018 E-flow Walter de Gruyter. All rights reserved.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50602 - Public administration

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/TD03000018" target="_blank" >TD03000018: Using social science research in analytical activities for strategic decision-making in public administration</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy

  • ISSN

    1337-9038

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    11

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    SK - SLOVAKIA

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

    219-234

  • UT code for WoS article

    000452424000010

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85058508338