When evidence is not taken for granted: the use and perception of evidence in the Czech Republic ministries
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F18%3A10384518" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/18:10384518 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2018-0020" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2018-0020</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2018-0020" target="_blank" >10.2478/nispa-2018-0020</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
When evidence is not taken for granted: the use and perception of evidence in the Czech Republic ministries
Original language description
Th e role of evidence in policy-making is one of the most researched topics in public policy and public administration. However, surprisingly little research has been done on how public offi cials actually use evidence in everyday life practice. Moreover, these studies have been limited to countries that have been influenced by the evidence-based policy movement (EBP). Little is known about how the evidence is conceptualized and utilized in other countries which have not been so strongly influenced by EBP movement. Th is paper addresses this gap. Using a large-N survey on the Czech ministerial offi cials and in-depth interviews with them, we explore what is understood under the term of "evidence", what kind of evidence is used and preferred by public offi cials and why. In doing so, we use four theoretical perspectives on the use of evidence. We show that despite the long-established tradition of using research in policy-making the importance of research evidence in the Czech Republic is far from being taken for granted. On the contrary, the immediate and personal experience is oft en preferred over the research fi ndings. Th e exception to that are census-like statistical data and comparative data published by international organizations. We fi nd some support for the two-communities metaphor, though these communities are not defi ned by their socio-demographic characteristics, but rather by their internal discourse and understanding of evidence. (C) 2018 E-flow Walter de Gruyter. All rights reserved.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50602 - Public administration
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/TD03000018" target="_blank" >TD03000018: Using social science research in analytical activities for strategic decision-making in public administration</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
ISSN
1337-9038
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
11
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
SK - SLOVAKIA
Number of pages
16
Pages from-to
219-234
UT code for WoS article
000452424000010
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85058508338