Governing Integration Policies in a Multi-Level Setting: Austria and Czechia Compared
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F24%3A10492942" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/24:10492942 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=WI9dLgvhvb" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=WI9dLgvhvb</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.54667/ceemr.2024.15" target="_blank" >10.54667/ceemr.2024.15</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Governing Integration Policies in a Multi-Level Setting: Austria and Czechia Compared
Original language description
In migration studies, scholars differ in their emphasis on which level of government plays the central role in immigrant integration policies. There are voices drawing attention to a 'local turn', highlighting the rising power of local actors in immigrant integration. At the same time, other authors point to a 'national turn', connected to the introduction of civic integration policies - or even the Europeanisation of integration policies coming from the supranational level. In order to better understand how integration policies are governed, this article compares the Austrian and Czech governance of these policies, examining the relationship between the different levels of government involved. The analysis is based on Scholten's typology of centralist, localist, decoupling and multi-level forms of governance. It asks how integration policies are governed in Austria and Czechia and how their governance changed with the implementation of civic integration policies. While centralist and decoupling tendencies appeared in the Austrian case, a multi-level governance approach emerged with civic integration in Czechia. These results disprove the assumption of a supposedly more likely multi-level governance approach in a federal state and a more centralised logic under the unitary regime, as suggested by the literature.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50601 - Political science
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Central and Eastern European Migration Review
ISSN
2300-1682
e-ISSN
2300-1682
Volume of the periodical
13
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
PL - POLAND
Number of pages
21
Pages from-to
55-75
UT code for WoS article
001375805800003
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85213303909