All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Interpreting Workflow Architectures by LLMs

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F25%3A10499966" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/25:10499966 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.5220/0013358000003928" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5220/0013358000003928</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0013358000003928" target="_blank" >10.5220/0013358000003928</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Interpreting Workflow Architectures by LLMs

  • Original language description

    In this paper, we focus on how reliably can a Large Lanuage Model (LLM) interpret a software architecture, namely a workflow architecture (WA). Even though our initial experiments show that an LLM can answer specific questions about a WA, it is unclear how correct its answers are. To this end, we propose a methodology to assess whether an LLM can correctly interpret a WA specification. Based on the conjecture that the LLM needs to correctly answer low-abstraction level questions to answer questions at a higher abstraction level properly, we define a set of test patterns, each of them providing a template for low-abstraction level questions, together with a metric for evaluating the correctness of LLM&apos;s answers. We posit that having this metric will allow us not only to establish which LLM model works the best with WAs, but also to determine what their concrete syntax and concepts are suitable to strengthen the correctness of LLM&apos;s interpretability of WA specifications. We demonstrate the methodology on the workflow specification language developed for a currently running Horizon Europe project.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering (ENASE 2025)

  • ISBN

    978-989-758-742-9

  • ISSN

    2184-4895

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    608-617

  • Publisher name

    SciTePress

  • Place of publication

    Neuveden

  • Event location

    Porto, Portugalsko

  • Event date

    Apr 4, 2025

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article