All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Unsatisfiability Proofs for Horn Solving

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F25%3A10507433" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/25:10507433 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-90653-4_4" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-90653-4_4</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-90653-4_4" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-031-90653-4_4</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Unsatisfiability Proofs for Horn Solving

  • Original language description

    Many verification tools currently rely on logic solvers as backend reasoning engines. Despite playing such a pivotal role, bugs are not uncommon in the complex codebases of these solvers. Validating their results is thus critical, with correctness witnesses often being used for this end. Output validation for constrained Horn clauses (CHC) solvers is not a well explored topic though, especially in regards to unsatisfiability results. This is a significant issue, given that CHC solvers are being increasingly employed in verification tooling. To address it, we propose an approach to validate CHC unsatisfiability results based on independently checkable proofs. Our approach is generic in regards to the solving algorithm, preprocessing steps, and exact proof format used, and works by first producing a coarse-grained proof during solving and then instantiating it into a suitable proof format by adding missing details, at which point the instantiated proof can be checked by an independent proof checker. We instrumented a state-of-the-art CHC solver to generate proofs in the Alethe format and performed a large-scale evaluation. Our results indicate that proofs can be produced with minimal overhead, can be efficiently checked, and have tractable sizes.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA23-06506S" target="_blank" >GA23-06506S: Advanced Analysis and Verification for Advanced Software</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems

  • ISBN

    978-3-031-90652-7

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    21

  • Pages from-to

    67-87

  • Publisher name

    Springer

  • Place of publication

    Cham

  • Event location

    Hamilton, Canada

  • Event date

    May 3, 2025

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article