All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Validation of CHC Satisfiability with ATHENA

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F25%3A10508710" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/25:10508710 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=lKeuB0EMKf" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=lKeuB0EMKf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3716505" target="_blank" >10.1145/3716505</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Validation of CHC Satisfiability with ATHENA

  • Original language description

    Formal verification tooling increasingly relies on logic solvers as automated reasoning engines. A commonality among these solvers is the high complexity of their codebases, which makes bug occurrence disturbingly frequent. Tool competitions have showcased many examples of state-of-the-art solvers disagreeing on the satisfiability of logic formulas, be it solvers for Boolean satisfiability (SAT), satisfiability modulo theories (SMT), or constrained Horn clauses (CHC). The validation of solvers&apos; results is thus of paramount importance, in order to increase the confidence not only in the solvers themselves but also in the tooling which they underpin. Among the formalisms commonly used by modern verification tools, CHC is one that has seen, at the same time, extensive practical usage and very little effort in result validation. We propose a two-layered validation approach for witnesses of CHC satisfiability that validates CHC models via proof-backed SMT queries. We developed a modular evaluation framework, ATHENA, and assessed the approach&apos;s viability via large scale experimentation, comparing three CHC solvers, five SMT solvers, and five proof checkers. Our results indicate that the approach is feasible, with the potential to be incorporated into CHC-based tooling, and also confirm the need for validation, with fourteen bugs being found in the tools used.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA23-06506S" target="_blank" >GA23-06506S: Advanced Analysis and Verification for Advanced Software</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Formal Aspects of Computing

  • ISSN

    0934-5043

  • e-ISSN

    1433-299X

  • Volume of the periodical

    37

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    20

  • Pages from-to

    30

  • UT code for WoS article

    001649554300005

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105023828947