Putting CLIL into Practice in Different Educational Contexts; Italy, Spain, Turkey, and the Czech Republic
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11410%2F22%3A10451836" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11410/22:10451836 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=CgoeunxZ.2" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=CgoeunxZ.2</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.29329/pedper.2022.493.3" target="_blank" >10.29329/pedper.2022.493.3</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Putting CLIL into Practice in Different Educational Contexts; Italy, Spain, Turkey, and the Czech Republic
Original language description
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is a dual-focused educational approach in which an additional language is used for the learning and teaching of both content and language. CLIL serves perfectly for the European aim of being 'plurilingual' to create a common future through a mutual understanding with the European citizens, who are able to speak at least two European languages capable enough to communicate and switch between languages, in addition to their mother tongue. This paper represents a comparative study of the differences in implementing CLIL methodology at the various national levels among one non-European, and three European countries, namely Italy, Spain, the Czech Republic, and Turkey. Not only does it tend to reveal the diversity of approaches towards CLIL as a popular method to teach and learn the content through a second language, but also it offers an insight into the legislation policies of these countries and their interest to promote CLIL as a national tool in supporting language learning to become a multicultural society. The aim of the study is to bring answers to the following questions (1) Is CLIL used at all levels of education? (2) Is it compulsory or voluntary to implement CLIL at schools? (3) Are these schools private or public? and last but not least (4) If the schools themselves can decide to implement CLIL or if they need approval from a higher authority. All four countries record an increase in the popularity of CLIL methodology in teaching and learning foreign languages, however as this paper demonstrates, levels and forms of implementation differ. The question for further investigation poses itself and sounds, "Is it a consequence of legislative support?".
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>ost</sub> - Miscellaneous article in a specialist periodical
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Pedagogical Perspective [online]
ISSN
2822-4841
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
1
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
TR - TURKEY
Number of pages
16
Pages from-to
99-114
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—