COMPARISON OF FOUR BOWEL CLEANSING AGENTS FOR COLONOSCOPY AND FACTORS AFFECTING THEIR EFFICIENCY - PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F20%3A00118653" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/20:00118653 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(20)30321-7/fulltext" target="_blank" >https://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(20)30321-7/fulltext</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
COMPARISON OF FOUR BOWEL CLEANSING AGENTS FOR COLONOSCOPY AND FACTORS AFFECTING THEIR EFFICIENCY - PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY
Original language description
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) was considered as a gold standard in bowel preparation before colonoscopy for a long time. Its main disadvantage is high volume (4l). Low volume solutions: oral sulphate-based solution (OSS), low volume PEG + ascorbic acid (2L-PEG/Asc) and sodium picosulphate + magnesium citric-acid solution (SP/MC) might be appropriate substitution of PEG.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)