COMPARISON OF FOUR BOWEL CLEANSING AGENTS FOR COLONOSCOPY AND FACTORS AFFECTING THEIR EFFICIENCY
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61383082%3A_____%2F20%3A00000977" target="_blank" >RIV/61383082:_____/20:00000977 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(20)30321-7/pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(20)30321-7/pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
COMPARISON OF FOUR BOWEL CLEANSING AGENTS FOR COLONOSCOPY AND FACTORS AFFECTING THEIR EFFICIENCY
Original language description
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) was considered as a gold standard in bowel preparation before colonoscopy for a long time. Its main disadvantage is high volume (4l). Low volume solutions: oral sulphate-based solution (OSS), low volume PEG + ascorbic acid (2L-PEG/Asc) and sodium picosulphate + magnesium citric-acid solution (SP/MC) might be appropriate substitution of PEG.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30219 - Gastroenterology and hepatology
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/NV18-08-00246" target="_blank" >NV18-08-00246: Endoscopic full thickness resection versus standard therapy of the colorectal neoplasia — prospective randomized study</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů