Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F16%3A00091118" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/16:00091118 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://argumentor.wordpress.com/" target="_blank" >https://argumentor.wordpress.com/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Argument of reciprocity: a unique scheme or not?
Original language description
In their famous The New rhetoric Chaim Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca presented a category of quasi-logical arguments as persuasive because of their similarity with mathematical and logical demonstrations. In this article, the persuasiveness of the quasi-logical argument is viewed from the perspective of pragma-dialectics. The first part of the article deals with the possibilities of transformation of the concept of quasi-logical arguments presented by the new rhetoric in accordance with meta-theoretical principles of pragma-dialectics. The crucial problem seems to be the identification of the function of quasi-logical arguments in solving a conflict of opinion. The second part compares the options of functionalization of quasi-logical arguments in a case study of their subtype, arguments of reciprocity. This paper presents a functionalization submitted by Bart Garssen that identifies quasi-logical reciprocity as one argument scheme appealing to the principle of “giving in return.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
AA - Philosophy and religion
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů