Two Methods for Representing Judicial Reasoning in the Framework of Coherence as Constraint Satisfaction

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F11%3A00054776" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/11:00054776 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Two Methods for Representing Judicial Reasoning in the Framework of Coherence as Constraint Satisfaction
Original language description
We attempt to present and compare two methods for representing cases in constraint satisfaction networks. The tension between top-down and bottom-up strategy as regards construction of models of reasoning has long tradition in the literature on AI. The same distinction applies to representations of legal argumentation. Our proposal compares the application of top-down and bottom-up strategy to representation of a chosen judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in constraint satisfaction networks. The first (top-down) approach is inspired by systems of defeasible logic and argumentation frameworks. The second approach makes use of bottom-up strategy and is more firmly grounded in the text of the court?s decision. The two methods lead to very similar results and yield interesting conclusions concerning the structure of the CJEU reasoning.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Publication year
2011
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Article name in the collection
Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2011
ISBN
978-1-60750-980-6
ISSN
0922-6389
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
2
Pages from-to
165-166
Publisher name
IOS Press
Place of publication
Amsterdam
Event location
Vienna
Event date
Jan 1, 2011
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—

Similar results(10)