How to Divide the Responsibility for a Repository Between Employer and Employee

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F15%3A00094534" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/15:00094534 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="http://repozitar.techlib.cz/record/993/files/idr-993_1.pdf" target="_blank" >http://repozitar.techlib.cz/record/993/files/idr-993_1.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Result language

čeština

Original language name

How to Divide the Responsibility for a Repository Between Employer and Employee

Original language description

Each research institution that operates a repository has to make a decision whether to allow all its employees to upload their own works (the liberal model) or whether to create a special organizational unit that will review and approve each file shared via repository. This dilemma is accompanied with another important decision that an institution needs to make. Should the institution let its researchers to freely license their works to whichever publisher they choose, or should it apply a managing approach to publication activities? The post will outline legal challenges of both approaches and will formulate practical recommendations, how to formulate internal institutional norms that regulate the institutional repository.

Czech name

How to Divide the Responsibility for a Repository Between Employer and Employee

Czech description

Each research institution that operates a repository has to make a decision whether to allow all its employees to upload their own works (the liberal model) or whether to create a special organizational unit that will review and approve each file shared via repository. This dilemma is accompanied with another important decision that an institution needs to make. Should the institution let its researchers to freely license their works to whichever publisher they choose, or should it apply a managing approach to publication activities? The post will outline legal challenges of both approaches and will formulate practical recommendations, how to formulate internal institutional norms that regulate the institutional repository.

Type

D - Article in proceedings

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

50501 - Law

Project

<a href="/en/project/GA15-20763S" target="_blank" >GA15-20763S: Legal Framework for Collecting, Processing, Storing and Utilizing of Research Data</a><br>

Continuities

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year

2015

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Article name in the collection

CONFERENCE ON GREY LITERATURE AND REPOSITORIES, Proceedings

ISBN

—

ISSN

2336-5021

e-ISSN

—

Number of pages

8

Pages from-to

69-76

Publisher name

Národní technická knihovna

Place of publication

Praha

Event location

Praha

Event date

Jan 1, 2015

Type of event by nationality

EUR - Evropská akce

UT code for WoS article

—