All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The disputable scope of EU competence to regulate consumer law

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F17%3A00120295" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/17:00120295 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-I0YJL4JR/41ef8e18-e1e2-4ba5-a755-294c30c3af50/PDF" target="_blank" >http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-I0YJL4JR/41ef8e18-e1e2-4ba5-a755-294c30c3af50/PDF</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The disputable scope of EU competence to regulate consumer law

  • Original language description

    The author focuses on the scope of the competence of the EU to regulate matters related to consumer protection and specifically on the way in which this competence is exercised. The traditional approach of the EU to the regulation of consumer law is discussed. The author reminds that the current legal basis of European consumer protection law is vitally connected with the internal market and with the trade between Member States and that there is no legal basis for EU legislation on consumer protection in general where there is no link to proper functioning of internal market. The EU policy, which is often too unreservedly supported by national governments, tends to ignore this fact and focuses more the policy itself. The author expresses the opinion that such approach is not correct for both legal and practical reasons. The disputable existence of EU competence is the main legal argument against a general EU regulation of consumer law. The majority of all transactions have a purely internal character with no link to the internal market whatsoever. Harmonization of rules establishes one common standard of a consumer applicable to all EU consumers, creating a “Chimera” of a “European consumer”, which in practice does not exist. Harmonization cannot sufficiently reflect the different needs and preferences in European countries. Questionable is also the whole idea of consumer protection at its current high level as it may represent an obstacle to free competition on internal market and generate a burden that might be unbearable for small and midsized business, which is often too easily overlooked.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Varstvo potrošnikov pri spletnem poslovanju

  • ISBN

    9789612473679

  • Number of pages of the result

    12

  • Pages from-to

    223-234

  • Number of pages of the book

    260

  • Publisher name

    GV Založba

  • Place of publication

    Lublaň

  • UT code for WoS chapter