ECtHR – Ally, Adversary, or Foe? The Attitudes of Judges Towards International Human Rights Law in the (Post-) Transitioning Area

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F19%3A00107831" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/19:00107831 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://www.ostrecht.de/fileadmin/user_upload/JOR-Inhaltsverzeichnisse/JOR_2019_Inhalt.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.ostrecht.de/fileadmin/user_upload/JOR-Inhaltsverzeichnisse/JOR_2019_Inhalt.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
ECtHR – Ally, Adversary, or Foe? The Attitudes of Judges Towards International Human Rights Law in the (Post-) Transitioning Area
Original language description
The role of domestic courts in the implementation of Strasbourg case law keeps puzzling both legal scholars and social scientists, especially due to rising criticism and legitimacy challenges of Strasbourg following some of its more controversial rulings. Does the ECtHR enjoy the output legitimacy in terms of the diffusion of its findings? Do domestic courts use and refer to Strasbourg? What are the conditions for such diffusion? This article analyses a case study of the Czech Supreme Court and the trends in its stance towards the ECtHR. It recommends measures for the successful internalisation and adoption of international human rights case law by judges of the old conservative courts in transitioning jurisdictions. The article builds on the dataset and analyses of the “Beyond Compliance” project.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Project
<a href="/en/project/GA16-09415S" target="_blank" >GA16-09415S: Beyond Compliance – Domestic Implementation of International Human Rights Case Law</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)