Automating employment disputes: A case selection framework
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F25%3A00140678" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/25:00140678 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/issues/2025/20-Februar-2025/automating-employmen_e4c33b0f98.html__ONCE&login=false" target="_blank" >https://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/issues/2025/20-Februar-2025/automating-employmen_e4c33b0f98.html__ONCE&login=false</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.38023/b4812f30-6e4a-4347-8244-dff856d0b316" target="_blank" >10.38023/b4812f30-6e4a-4347-8244-dff856d0b316</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Automating employment disputes: A case selection framework
Original language description
The increasing volume of legal disputes, particularly within labour law, has overburdened judicial systems, extending case durations and undermining legal certainty for affected individuals. Recent technological advancements offer potential solutions for alleviating this load through automation and augmented decision-making processes. However, the integration of technology in labour dispute resolution must be approached cautiously, adhering to principles such as Susskind’s maxim, which emphasizes that any technology deployed should substantively improve legal processes. This article explores a structured framework for deploying automation within labour law, identifying case types suitable for automation based on factors like legal and technological complexity. It outlines the need for a multi-tiered approach that escalates from negotiation to binding decisions, tailored specifically for less complex, high-volume cases. The framework also highlights critical legal considerations, such as safeguarding fundamental rights, procedural due process, and human oversight, ensuring that automated systems do not compromise these protections. By establishing pilot cases within a controlled environment, we aim to ensure that the technology‘s application not only enhances efficiency but also respects legal standards and safeguards human dignity and autonomy in automated labour dispute resolution.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50501 - Law
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Jusletter IT
ISSN
1664-848X
e-ISSN
1664-848X
Volume of the periodical
2025
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2025
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
55-62
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105013165703