The proportion of integrationists among Czech psychotherapists and counselors : A comparison of multiple criteria
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F17%3A00096746" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/17:00096746 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000069" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000069</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000069" target="_blank" >10.1037/int0000069</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The proportion of integrationists among Czech psychotherapists and counselors : A comparison of multiple criteria
Original language description
A psychotherapist’s integrationism/eclecticism can be operationalized in different ways. Existing studies estimating the proportion of integrationists/eclectics typically utilized a single criterion, often yielding incomparable results. The goal of this study was to estimate the prevalence of integrationism/eclecticism using four different criteria based on psychotherapy training, self-identified theoretical orientation and the use of psychotherapy techniques. The analysis was based on questionnaire data obtained from N = 373 Czech psychotherapy and counseling practitioners in an online survey. The proportion of integrationists was estimated to be 21.7, 32.7, 87.7, and 98.9 percent, depending on the criterion used. Furthermore, the endorsement of several types of integration was estimated and the frequency of combinations of the main theoretical orientations was explored. The findings are discussed in the context of previous studies and emphasize the role of adequate operationalization of integrationism. The results suggest that while the self-rated theoretical orientation may reflect a practitioner’s professional identity and affiliation, measurement on the level of techniques may be more sensitive to the real-life integration of various orientations.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50100 - Psychology and cognitive sciences
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Psychotherapy Integration
ISSN
1053-0479
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
27
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
13-22
UT code for WoS article
000423038800003
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85007559125