All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Whose Public Reason? Which Justification of Laws? A Natural Law Response

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F21%3A00119246" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/21:00119246 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.cairn.info/revue-de-metaphysique-et-de-morale-2021-4-page-507.htm" target="_blank" >https://www.cairn.info/revue-de-metaphysique-et-de-morale-2021-4-page-507.htm</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rmm.214.0507" target="_blank" >10.3917/rmm.214.0507</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Whose Public Reason? Which Justification of Laws? A Natural Law Response

  • Original language description

    A persistent puzzle for practical philosophy centres on finding the appropriate path to justify the laws whose purpose is to regulate the functioning of constitutional democracies. Public reason liberals deny that this justification could come from comprehensive doctrines, since the laws must be justifiable to all (reasonable) citizens. The natural law tradition offers a useful test of the plausibility of this claim. This article illustrates how the two versions of public reason liberalism differ in their openness to natural law reasons, and why, given the influence of their disparate starting points on the normative standards by which they assess laws, natural law exponents have good reason to reject both.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60300 - Philosophy, Ethics and Religion

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA19-11091S" target="_blank" >GA19-11091S: Beyond Public Reason? Critiques and Defences of the Liberal Agenda of Public Justification</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale

  • ISSN

    0035-1571

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    112

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    FR - FRANCE

  • Number of pages

    18

  • Pages from-to

    507-524

  • UT code for WoS article

    000740975200006

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85127573778