Associations between Severity and Attributions : Differences for Public and Private Face-to-face and Cyber Victimization
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F21%3A00123111" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/21:00123111 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-021-09660-7" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-021-09660-7</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12103-021-09660-7" target="_blank" >10.1007/s12103-021-09660-7</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Associations between Severity and Attributions : Differences for Public and Private Face-to-face and Cyber Victimization
Original language description
Little attention has been given to whether country of origin as well as perceptions of severity impact adolescents’ attributions for public and private face-to-face and cyber victimization. The objective of the present study was to examine the role of medium (face-to-face, cyber), setting (public, private), and perceptions of severity in adolescents’ attributions for victimization, while accounting for gender and cultural values. Participants included 3,432 adolescents (ages 11–15; 49% girls) from China, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, India, Japan, and the United States. Adolescents completed a questionnaire on their cultural values and read four hypothetical peer victimization scenarios, including public face-to-face victimization, private face-to-face victimization, public cyber victimization, and private cyber victimization. They rated the severity of each scenario and how likely they would use various attributions to explain the victimization scenarios, including self-blame, aggressor-blame, joking, normative, and conflict attributions. The findings revealed that attributions varied based on severity, and that this relationship was moderated by setting and medium of victimization, as well as varied by country of origin. Taken together, the results from this study indicate complex differences in attributions based on setting, medium, perceptions of severity, and country of origin.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50100 - Psychology and cognitive sciences
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
American Journal of Criminal Justice
ISSN
1066-2316
e-ISSN
1936-1351
Volume of the periodical
46
Issue of the periodical within the volume
6
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
19
Pages from-to
843-861
UT code for WoS article
000721682500001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85119836198