All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Associations between Severity and Attributions : Differences for Public and Private Face-to-face and Cyber Victimization

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F21%3A00123111" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/21:00123111 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-021-09660-7" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-021-09660-7</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12103-021-09660-7" target="_blank" >10.1007/s12103-021-09660-7</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Associations between Severity and Attributions : Differences for Public and Private Face-to-face and Cyber Victimization

  • Original language description

    Little attention has been given to whether country of origin as well as perceptions of severity impact adolescents’ attributions for public and private face-to-face and cyber victimization. The objective of the present study was to examine the role of medium (face-to-face, cyber), setting (public, private), and perceptions of severity in adolescents’ attributions for victimization, while accounting for gender and cultural values. Participants included 3,432 adolescents (ages 11–15; 49% girls) from China, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, India, Japan, and the United States. Adolescents completed a questionnaire on their cultural values and read four hypothetical peer victimization scenarios, including public face-to-face victimization, private face-to-face victimization, public cyber victimization, and private cyber victimization. They rated the severity of each scenario and how likely they would use various attributions to explain the victimization scenarios, including self-blame, aggressor-blame, joking, normative, and conflict attributions. The findings revealed that attributions varied based on severity, and that this relationship was moderated by setting and medium of victimization, as well as varied by country of origin. Taken together, the results from this study indicate complex differences in attributions based on setting, medium, perceptions of severity, and country of origin.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50100 - Psychology and cognitive sciences

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    American Journal of Criminal Justice

  • ISSN

    1066-2316

  • e-ISSN

    1936-1351

  • Volume of the periodical

    46

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    6

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    19

  • Pages from-to

    843-861

  • UT code for WoS article

    000721682500001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85119836198