Extraction of polycyclic aromatic nitrogen heterocycles from spiked soil samples
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F07%3A00023775" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/07:00023775 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/68081715:_____/07:00090196
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Extraction of polycyclic aromatic nitrogen heterocycles from spiked soil samples
Original language description
Extraction recovery of ten selected polycyclic aromatic nitrogen heterocycles (PANHs), quinoline, 2-methylquinoline, 6-methylquinoline, 8-methylquinoline, acridine, benzo[h]quinoline, phenantridine, indole, 2-methylindole and carbazole from spiked soil samples was tested. Four different extraction techniques, pressurised solvent extraction (PSE), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), Soxhlet warm extraction (SOXW) and standard Soxhlet extraction (SOX) were applied and compared. RP-HPLC technique with silica-based octadecyl stationary phase was used for recovery determination of individual PANHs. Supercritical fluid extraction has been found the most effective method for the extraction of selected PANHs from soil. Pressurised solvent extraction and Soxhlet warm extraction methods offered similar results with slightly lower extraction recoveries compared to SFE. On the contrary, standard Soxhlet extraction as a time consuming method with the low recovery of target analytes did not prove
Czech name
Extrakce polycyklických aromatických dusíkatých heterocyklů z půdních vzorků
Czech description
Extraction recovery of ten selected polycyclic aromatic nitrogen heterocycles (PANHs), quinoline, 2-methylquinoline, 6-methylquinoline, 8-methylquinoline, acridine, benzo[h]quinoline, phenantridine, indole, 2-methylindole and carbazole from spiked soil samples was tested. Four different extraction techniques, pressurised solvent extraction (PSE), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), Soxhlet warm extraction (SOXW) and standard Soxhlet extraction (SOX) were applied and compared. RP-HPLC technique with silica-based octadecyl stationary phase was used for recovery determination of individual PANHs. Supercritical fluid extraction has been found the most effective method for the extraction of selected PANHs from soil. Pressurised solvent extraction and Soxhlet warm extraction methods offered similar results with slightly lower extraction recoveries compared to SFE. On the contrary, standard Soxhlet extraction as a time consuming method with the low recovery of target analytes did not prove
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
CB - Analytical chemistry, separation
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)
Others
Publication year
2007
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
ISSN
1029-0397
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
87
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
13
Pages from-to
111-123
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—