All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Time-space complexity advantages for quantum computing

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14330%2F17%3A00100568" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14330/17:00100568 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71069-3_24" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71069-3_24</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71069-3_24" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-319-71069-3_24</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Time-space complexity advantages for quantum computing

  • Original language description

    It has been proved that quantum computing has advantages in query complexity, communication complexity and also other computing models. However, it is hard to prove strictly that quantum computing has advantage in the Turing machine models in time complexity. For example, we do not know how to prove that Shor’s algorithm is strictly better than any classical algorithm, since we do not know the lower bound of time complexity of the factoring problem in Turing machine. In this paper, we consider the time-space complexity and prove strictly that quantum computing has advantages compared to their classical counterparts. We prove: (1) a time-space upper bound for recognition of the languages LI N T(n) on two-way finite automata with quantum and classical states (2QCFA): TS= O(n3/2log n), whereas a lower bound on probabilistic Turing machine is TS= Omega(n2); (2) a time-space upper bound for recognition of the languages LN E(n) on exact 2QCFA: TS= O(n1.87log n), whereas a lower bound on probabilistic Turing machine is TS= Omega(n2). It has been proved (Klauck, STOC’00) that the exact one-way quantum finite automata have no advantage comparing to classical finite automata in recognizing languages. However, the result (2) shows that the exact 2QCFA do have an advantage in comparison with their classical counterparts, which is the first example showing that the exact quantum computing has advantage in time-space complexity comparing to classical computing.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 10687: 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Natural Computing, TPNC 2017

  • ISBN

    9783319710686

  • ISSN

    0302-9743

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    305-317

  • Publisher name

    Springer

  • Place of publication

    Cham, Switzerland

  • Event location

    Praha

  • Event date

    Jan 1, 2017

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    000450354700024