All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Minerva: The curse of ECDSA nonces

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14330%2F20%3A00114222" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14330/20:00114222 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://minerva.crocs.fi.muni.cz/" target="_blank" >https://minerva.crocs.fi.muni.cz/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13154/tches.v2020.i4.281-308" target="_blank" >10.13154/tches.v2020.i4.281-308</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Minerva: The curse of ECDSA nonces

  • Original language description

    We present our discovery of a group of side-channel vulnerabilities in implementations of the ECDSA signature algorithm in a widely used Atmel AT90SC FIPS 140-2 certified smartcard chip and five cryptographic libraries (libgcrypt, wolfSSL, MatrixSSL, SunEC/OpenJDK/Oracle JDK, Crypto++). Vulnerable implementations leak the bit-length of the scalar used in scalar multiplication via timing. Using leaked bit-length, we mount a lattice attack on a 256-bit curve, after observing enough signing operations. We propose two new methods to recover the full private key requiring just 500 signatures for simulated leakage data, 1200 for real cryptographic library data, and 2100 for smartcard data. The number of signatures needed for a successful attack depends on the chosen method and its parameters as well as on the noise profile, influenced by the type of leakage and used computation platform. We use the set of vulnerabilities reported in this paper, together with the recently published TPM-FAIL vulnerability [MSE+20] as a basis for real-world benchmark datasets to systematically compare our newly proposed methods and all previously published applicable lattice-based key recovery methods. The resulting exhaustive comparison highlights the methods’ sensitivity to its proper parametrization and demonstrates that our methods are more efficient in most cases. For the TPM-FAIL dataset, we decreased the number of required signatures from approximately 40 000 to mere 900.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA20-03426S" target="_blank" >GA20-03426S: Examining and improving security of elliptic curve cryptography</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems

  • ISBN

  • ISSN

    2569-2925

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    28

  • Pages from-to

    281-308

  • Publisher name

    Ruhr-University of Bochum

  • Place of publication

    Německo

  • Event location

    online

  • Event date

    Jan 1, 2020

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article