All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Would You Do It?: Enacting Moral Dilemmas in Virtual Reality for Understanding Ethical Decision-Making

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14330%2F20%3A00118590" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14330/20:00118590 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376788" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376788</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376788" target="_blank" >10.1145/3313831.3376788</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Would You Do It?: Enacting Moral Dilemmas in Virtual Reality for Understanding Ethical Decision-Making

  • Original language description

    A moral dilemma is a decision-making paradox without unambiguously acceptable or preferable options. This paper investigates if and how the virtual enactment of two renowned moral dilemmas---the Trolley and the Mad Bomber---influence decision-making when compared with mentally visualizing such situations. We conducted two user studies with two gender-balanced samples of 60 participants in total that compared between paper-based and virtual-reality (VR) conditions, while simulating 5 distinct scenarios for the Trolley dilemma, and 4 storyline scenarios for the Mad Bomber's dilemma. Our findings suggest that the VR enactment of moral dilemmas further fosters utilitarian decision-making, while it amplifies biases such as sparing juveniles and seeking retribution. Ultimately, we theorize that the VR enactment of renowned moral dilemmas can yield ecologically-valid data for training future Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems on ethical decision-making, and we elicit early design principles for the training of such systems.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

  • ISBN

    9781450367080

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    12

  • Pages from-to

    1-12

  • Publisher name

    ACM

  • Place of publication

    New York, NY, USA

  • Event location

    New York, NY, USA

  • Event date

    Jan 1, 2020

  • Type of event by nationality

    CST - Celostátní akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    000696110400077