All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Bilingual Lexicon Induction From Comparable and Parallel Data: A Comparative Analysis

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14330%2F24%3A00136956" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14330/24:00136956 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70563-2_3" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70563-2_3</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70563-2_3" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-031-70563-2_3</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Bilingual Lexicon Induction From Comparable and Parallel Data: A Comparative Analysis

  • Original language description

    Bilingual lexicon induction (BLI) from comparable data has become a common way of evaluating cross-lingual word embeddings (CWEs). These models have drawn much attention, mainly due to their availability for rare and low-resource language pairs. An alternative offers systems exploiting parallel data, such as popular neural machine translation systems (NMTSs), which are effective and yield state-of-the-art results. Despite the significant advancements in NMTSs, their effectiveness in the BLI task compared to the models using comparable data remains underexplored. In this paper, we provide a comparative study of the NMTS and CWE models evaluated on the BLI task and demonstrate the results across three diverse language pairs: distant (Estonian-English) and close (Estonian-Finnish) language pair and language pair with different scripts (Estonian-Russian). Our study reveals the differences, strengths, and limitations of both approaches. We show that while NMTSs achieve impressive results for languages with a great amount of training data available, CWEs emerge as a better option when faced less resources.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    International Conference on Text, Speech, and Dialogue

  • ISBN

    9783031705625

  • ISSN

    0302-9743

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    30-42

  • Publisher name

    Springer Nature Switzerland

  • Place of publication

    Cham

  • Event location

    Cham

  • Event date

    Jan 1, 2024

  • Type of event by nationality

    CST - Celostátní akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    001307840300003