Immunizations as Rules Violations
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14560%2F19%3A00110119" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14560/19:00110119 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://ecargument.org/" target="_blank" >http://ecargument.org/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Immunizations as Rules Violations
Original language description
Boudry and Braeckman (2011) regard immunizing strategies as arguments. I will argue against and show that (A) immunizing strategies are not arguments and (B) they are instead violations of rules of (critical) discussion. I will (A) show problems with analyses of examples using the Toulmin model of argument, and I will (B) show that the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation can explain each type of immunizations as violations of particular rules of critical discussion.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50204 - Business and management
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů