Measuring the environmental sustainability of 2030 Agenda implementation in EU countries: How do different assessment methods affect results?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14560%2F22%3A00126635" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14560/22:00126635 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116152" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116152</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116152" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116152</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Measuring the environmental sustainability of 2030 Agenda implementation in EU countries: How do different assessment methods affect results?
Original language description
One of the most significant issues worldwide is the lack of environmental sustainability which is mainly due to negative consequences of human actions. When considering sustainability, social and economic development is founded on a healthy environment. Without it, it is not possible to use natural resources efficiently and increase the quality of life. Our paper focuses on environmental sustainability by analysing the environmental Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) given by the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2030 Agenda). The aim of this article is to compare assessment of the environmental sustainability of 2030 Agenda in the EU-27 countries through the three commonly used methods, using the two sets of indicators. We use SDG Index, Distance Measure, and Progress Measure, using the both world and European indicators. The results showed substantial differences between EU countries in achieving the environmental goals of 2030 Agenda. However, the country's results and rankings are shown to be very sensitive to the methodological approach and the indicators used. Evaluations revealed many discrepancies and inconsistencies that could lead to misguided conclusions regarding a country's political decision making.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50200 - Economics and Business
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Environmental Management
ISSN
0301-4797
e-ISSN
1095-8630
Volume of the periodical
322
Issue of the periodical within the volume
November
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
1-8
UT code for WoS article
000861215400001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85138809967