All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Four Paths from a Single Crossroads: Supporting the Innovation Development in the Visegrad Group

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14560%2F25%3A00143714" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14560/25:00143714 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://editorial.upce.cz/1804-8048/33/1/2464" target="_blank" >https://editorial.upce.cz/1804-8048/33/1/2464</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.46585/sp33012464" target="_blank" >10.46585/sp33012464</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Four Paths from a Single Crossroads: Supporting the Innovation Development in the Visegrad Group

  • Original language description

    This study examines how the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia support innovation in business within EU cohesion policy. Although these countries share a similar pre-1989 history, they differ in their economic development and in how they implement cohesion policy. Existing studies mainly examine how public support relates to economic outcomes.This study addresses this research gap by examining how four Central European countries implement innovation support. This paper aims to analyse and compare the approaches of the Visegrad Group countries to supporting innovation in enterprises from EU cohesion policy funds in the programming period 2014-2020. The comparison focuses on operational programmes, financial allocations, supported projects, institutional arrangements and monitoring indicators. The primary data for this study comes from the European Commission's Cohesion Open Data Platform. The results indicate that the Czech Republic and Hungary apply a similar approach to the structure of their support programmes. Poland, by contrast, adopts a more regionally differentiated model, reflecting the principle that "one size does not fit all." The Czech Republic has also established a strong institutional framework for programme implementation. The greatest number of limitations was identified in Slovakia.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration

  • ISSN

    1211-555X

  • e-ISSN

    1804-8048

  • Volume of the periodical

    33

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    18

  • Pages from-to

    1-18

  • UT code for WoS article

    001691783200001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105034539353